|
Final Report
Major
Goals and Objectives: The
main goal of the research was to conduct preliminary research that
would lead to the development of a rapid assay for the analysis of
PCBs in fish tissue, in order to offer options to the expensive
and time-consuming FDA method. This method would be less
expensive, less time consuming and produce less waste then the
method currently being used.
The major
objectives of the research were:
-
To improve the extraction and clean-up methods before using
a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the
analysis of PCBs in fish tissue. In addition, an aim of the
research is to increase the sensitivity and the selectivity of the
ELISA.
- To demonstrate the effectiveness of this method for the
analysis of fish tissue collected during an annual State-wide
survey.
- To compare total PCB concentrations determined using
gas-chromatography/electron capture detection (GC/ECD) with those
determined using ELISA.
- To
apply the extraction and cleanup procedure for another ELISA to
measure the toxicity equivalence quotient (TEQ) in fish.
Summary
of Progress towards Goals and Objectives: Standard
curves for Aroclor 1254, developed using fortified catfish tissue,
gave a linear range for the two standard curves (0.05 to 0.5 ppm
and 0.5 to 5.0 ppm) and correlation coefficients of 0.97 and 0.98,
respectively. Eleven fish samples that were previously found to
contain Aroclor 1254 and 1260 at levels above the detection limit
of 50 ppb, were analyzed for their total PCB content using ELISA.
The values obtained from the ELISA were comparable to those from
the standard FDA GC/ECD method.
Accomplishments:
From the data obtained thus far, it
appears that the clean-up, extraction and the ELISA are more
economical, efficient and produce less waste than the conventional
FDA method. This method may allow State agencies to expand their
sample numbers with increased throughput. This method can also be
used to develop fish consumption advisories that more accurately
articulate health risks from the consumption of contaminated fish.
Keywords:
PCBs, fish, consumption advisory, ELISA
Narrative
Report: Catfish
tissue was obtained from a local grocery store and ground into a
homogenous mixture. The final fat content of the catfish
homogenate was adjusted to 5.2% by adding an appropriate amount of
belly flap tissue. Fish tissue (1.0000g) was mixed with anhydrous
sodium sulfate and allowed to dry for several hours. The PCB in
the fish sample was extracted through a sulfuric acid-silica gel
column with 20 ml hexane. An aliquot of the analyte was exchanged
into 50% (v/v) methanol and analyzed using ELISA.
Standard
curves for PCBs in fish were obtained in the ranges of 0.05 to 0.5
ppm and 0.5 to 5.0 ppm of Aroclor 1254. The minimum and the most
appropriate volume of hexane used for elution of PCBs, was found
to be 20 mL. The dilution factors for the two curves were
calculated prior to each sample analysis and were done such that
the upper concentration of each standard curve coincided with the
maximum working range of the kit (i.e., 5 ppb). Therefore, the
dilution factors for the two standard curves were 100 and 1000.
Standard curves for the range of 0.05 to 0.5 ppm and 0.5 to 5 ppm
were constructed by plotting Logit B/Bo (relative concentration)
against Ln (concentration). The Aroclor 1254 standard curve
ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 ppm gave a correlation coefficient of
0.97. The curve ranging from 0.5 to 5.0 ppm gave a correlation
coefficient of 0.98.
Eleven
contaminated fish samples, collected during an Indiana fish
survey, were analyzed using ELISA. All the samples tested had
detectable PCB residues. The levels detected ranged up to 519 ppb.
These samples were previously tested using the FDA GC/ECD method
and found to have levels ranging up to 570 ppb. A t-test was
carried out for data collected from the FDA GC/ECD and the ELISA
methods. No significant differences were found between these data
sets (degrees of freedom = 9, t(9)0.05=1.833, ts=2.19,
reject Ho at p<0.05).
In
the experiments carried out, the extract solvents used for the
ELISA were methanol and water in the ratio of 1:1. The tests were
also done randomly to remove any bias while carrying out the
extraction and the ELISA. The standard curve ranging from 0.05 to
0.5 ppm Aroclor 1254 was repeated using the methanol and the ELISA
zero standard as the diluent for the sample extract. The ELISA
temperature was controlled in a water bath at a temperature of
23C. The standard curve ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 ppm Aroclor 1254
gave a correlation coefficient of 0.976.
During the
initial stages of experimentation several problems were resolved
with regard to linearity. For that purpose, a pilot study was
conducted wherein 14C-PCB 153 was used to track the
fate of PCB through the column. The data indicated that about 95%
PCB was being recovered from the column and that the losses of PCB
could not be owed to loss within the column but were probably the
result using of water as a solvent (low PCB solubility).
However, further work needs to be carried out to determine
the selectivity of the antibodies for congeners present in Aroclor
1242, 1248 and 1260. The extraction and cleanup method developed
here will next be used in conjunction with another ELISA to
determine the TEQ for various fish samples.
Summary:
The project was
based on the analysis of PCBs in fish tissue using enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA). However, the ELISA is very sensitive
to interferences and therefore, the use of such a kit warrants an
elaborate clean-up and extraction method for PCBs from fish
tissue. One limitation of ELISA when measuring lipophilic
compounds has been the extraction and cleanup requirements
necessary to eliminate interferences. In this research we were
able to improve the extraction and clean-up methods required, so
as to increase the sensitivity of the ELISA. Standard curves for
Aroclor 1254 in the range of 0.05 to 0.5 ppm and 0.5 to 5.0 ppm
were developed, which had correlation coefficients of 0.97 and
0.98 respectively. Eleven other fish samples collected during an
Indiana fish survey were analyzed using this method. The data
obtained using the ELISA was comparable with that of the GC/ECD
data. The comparison indicated that the results obtained through
the ELISA were not significantly different from those obtained
using the GC/ECD. The advantages of this technique are that the
clean-up extraction and ELISA are far more time efficient,
economical and produce less waste than the conventional FDA method
for analysis of PCBs in fish tissue.
Graduate
Students Supported:
Ping Wan,
M.S. student
Joanne Lasrado, Ph.D. student
Table 1:
Comparison of ELISA data with GC/ECD data for total PCB in
contaminated fish samples.
Fish
Sample
|
Total PCB (ppm)
ELISA Method
|
Total PCB (ppm) GC/ECD Method
|
|
Replicate
1
|
Replicate
2
|
S.D.
|
|
|
1
|
0.516
|
0.421
|
0.066
|
0.320
|
|
2
|
0.096
|
0.077
|
0.013
|
0.150
|
|
3
|
0.178
|
0.327
|
0.105
|
0.170
|
|
4
|
0.519
|
0.451
|
0.048
|
0.327
|
|
5
|
0.230
|
0.287
|
0.040
|
0.370
|
|
6
|
0.137
|
0.102
|
0.024
|
0.200
|
|
7
|
0.207
|
0.125
|
0.058
|
0.180
|
|
8
|
0.508
|
0.498
|
0.006
|
0.470
|
|
9
|
0.394
|
0.239
|
0.010
|
0.420
|
|
10
|
0.288
|
0.279
|
0.006
|
0.540
|
|
11
|
0.294
|
0.404
|
0.077
|
0.570
|
|