|
Back to WIC Info Page
Water for Our Future
Download PDF (370KB)
IISG-03-09
Understanding
Contaminated Sediments: Bioavailability of Contamination
L. E. Dorworth, Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue
University Calumet, Hammond, Indiana
An Overview of the
Problem
The ecological and
health effects associated with contaminated sediments are of national
and international concern. In the past, municipal and industrial
wastewaters were discharged into rivers and streams without adequate
treatment. Even now, improperly functioning and failing septic systems
add to water quality problems.
Pollutants in the
wastewater, such as metals and hydrophobic organic compounds, chemically
attach to particles in the water and eventually settle to the bottom.
Although wastewater discharges have continued to improve, the sediments
that were once a repository for hydrophobic chemicals are now a source
of chemical contamination to the benthic (bottom) and pelagic (water
column) ecosystems.
What Are Sediments?
Fine soil or mineral
particles that settle to the bottom of the water or are suspended in it
are classified as sediments. Our increased ability to measure chemicals
in the environment has brought a new awareness that soil particles, and
the chemicals attached to soil particles in the water, may pose an
environmental problem.
Is This A National
Problem?
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has designated contaminated sediments as one of
the agency’s top concerns. Sediment contamination is an important issue,
not only because of concerns associated with human health threats and
ecological problems, but also because of the economic impacts associated
with disposal of contaminated sediments.
The EPA estimates
that, overall, ten percent of the nation’s lakes, rivers and bays
contain sediments contaminated with toxic chemicals. These chemicals
impair the health of the fish living in those waters. Health problems of
individuals and wildlife that consume contaminated fish have been
documented.
Fifteen percent of the
nation’s lake acreage and five percent of the nation’s river miles are
under state-issued fish consumption advisories. Fish consumption
advisories recommend limits on the amount of fish eaten on a weekly or
monthly basis, based on the species of fish and overall length of that
fish.
In addition to having
health concerns, economic activity may be affected by sediment
contamination due to loss of recreational and commercial fishing and
through the increased costs of disposal of contaminated dredge material.
Why Should I Care
About What’s in the Sediments?
Benthic sediments are
a habitat for bottom dwelling organisms such as insects, worms,
shellfish and some fish. Many of these organisms obtain their food from
the sediments in which they live. Species tolerant to contaminated
sediments may replace native species that are intolerant of contaminated
sediments. A change in the population inhabiting the sediments will
impact the animal species that live in the water above the sediments due
to a change in food resources.
A fish may consume
food such as phytoplankton, zooplankton and other animals from
contaminated sediments and the surrounding waters. Although pollutants
may be excreted by a fish, most of the persistent contaminants are
stored in the muscle and fat tissue and gradually build up or
bioaccumulate. The concentrations of persistent contaminants in larger
lake fish may be a million times higher per weight than contaminant
concentrations in the surrounding waters. The process by which a
contaminant increases in concentration as it rises in the food chain
(phytoplankton zooplankton fish) is known as biomagnification.
Impacts that
Contaminated Sediments have on the Ecosystem and Beyond
- Tumors and
other deformities in bottom-dwelling fish;
- Degraded
bottom communities,
which results in a loss or reduction in
fish food;
- Degraded
habitats for both fish and
wildlife;
-
Bioaccumulation of contaminants
go up the food chain, which results in
fish and wildlife advisories;
- Possible
human health risks from
exposure to sediment-derived contaminants;
-
Restrictions on navigational dredging; and
-
Restrictions on re-use of dredged material.
|
How Do the
Sediments Become Contaminated?
Contaminants come from
a wide range of sources including contaminated runoff from cities,
suburbs and farms, air pollution, some industries and recreational
activities. This is nonpoint source pollution. Nonpoint source pollution
comes
from sources that cannot be directly identified. On the other hand,
point source pollution can be identified based on an observable
release–for example an industrial stack discharge.
Contaminants may be
physically or chemically bound to sediment particles. While the list of
chemicals that can be bound to sediments is almost endless, here are a
few of the more common pollutants:
- Persistent
chlorinated organics such as polychlorinated hydrocarbons (PCBs);
- Metals such as
mercury, zinc, and lead;
- Polyaromatic
hydrocarbons which includes pesticides, oils and fuels; and
- Incomplete
combustion of organic compounds.
Could Contaminants
Pose a Health Risk?
It appears as though
some contaminants are less likely to be incorporated into the chemical
makeup of an organism. This refers to bioavailability of a chemical to
an organism. Bioavailability is the measure of the uptake of an
ingested substance by the body as assessed by its concentration in the
blood. Therefore, the contaminant levels found in the environment
and available to organisms may not correlate with actual risk or health
problems.
Remediation. Is It
the Answer?
Sediment removal is an
expensive venture, from removing and placing the sediment in an
appropriate despository to incineration or land filling the contaminated
materials. An alternative to sediment removal is managing it in place,
which can also lead to sediment solidification. Managing contaminated
sediment in place requires a complete chemical, biological and physical
understanding of the fate and mobility of contaminants. This includes
information on groundwater flow, wave action, resuspension via boaters
and ships and storm action, as well as diffusion and bioturbation.
If impacted sediments
are left in place, it is critical to evaluate potential pathways by
which contaminants may pose an ecological or human health risk and to
monitor, minimize, or eliminate these pathways.
A possible approach to
this problem is to remediate the site. Remediate means to solve a
problem. The use of biological organisms, such as microorganisms and
plants, to consume and reduce contaminants found in sediment, soil or
groundwater is referred to a bioremediation.
In a non-polluted
environment, bacteria, fungi, protists, and other microorganisms are
constantly at work breaking down organic matter. When an organic
pollutant, such as oil, contaminates an environment, some of the
microorganisms
may die, while others capable of eating the organic pollutant will
survive.
Bioremediation works
by providing pollutant-eating, tolerant organisms with fertilizer,
oxygen, and other conditions that encourage rapid growth. The organisms
can then break down the organic pollutant at a correspondingly faster
rate.
Bioremediation of a
contaminated site typically works in one of two ways. As in the case
described previously, ways are found to enhance the growth of whatever
pollutant-eating tolerant microbes might already be living at the
contaminated site. Another, less common method of bioremediation , is to
introduce specialized microbes to degrade specific contaminants.
Bioremediation
provides a good strategy for cleaning up some types of pollution, but it
will not work for all types of pollution. For example, bioremediation
may not provide a feasible strategy at sites with high concentrations of
chemicals that are
too toxic to most microorganisms. However, it provides a technique for
cleaning up pollution by enhancing the same biodegradation processes
that occur in nature. Depending on the site and the kinds and amounts of
contaminants,
bioremediation may be safer and less expensive than alternative
solutions. Bioremediation also has the advantage of
treating the contaminants in place. This means that costs may be lower
because large quantities of soil, sediment or water do not have to be
dug up or pumped out of the ground for treatment.
There is one main
disadvantage to bioremediation and that is the amount of time needed for
the process to occur. Bioremediation may require anywhere from 30
to 100 years, depending on the site and the contaminants.
Assessing the Steps
Toward Remediation
Contaminated sediment
management efforts are never 100 percent effective. There is always some
residual contamination that must be managed, either passively, through
monitoring, or by remedial actions. The Sediment Management Workgroup (www.smwg.org),
comprised of stakeholders from federal, state, and local governments,
universities, and professional organizations, suggests the following
management considerations for contaminated sediments:
- The management
strategy should be based on sound science and risk assessment/risk
management principles, taking into consideration site-specific
conditions.
- On-site remediation
should be based on a complete understanding of contaminant movement
and uptake and exposure pathways in aquatic biota.
- Weighing the risks
and benefits of intrusive sediment management over allowing a system
the opportunity to undergo natural recovery. In this manner,
actions that have the least potential to disrupt natural systems while
still achieving remediation in a reasonable time can be fully
evaluated and considered.
- Site-specific risk
assessment and risk management decisions will provide the basis for
sediment management strategy. Based on this evaluation, some sites
will require dredging, some sites may rely on natural recovery and
other sites may need a mix of remedial action.
More information on this subject may be found at the following:
Bioavailability of
Contaminants in Soils and Sediments: Processes, Tools, and
Applications. National Research Council of the National Academies.
2003. ISBN 0-309-08625-6.
Sediment Management
Workgroup at <www.smwg.org>
Great Lakes National
Program Office at <www.epa.gov/glnpo>
Sediments
Remediation Action Team at <www.rtdf.org/public/sediment/default.htm>
Acknowledgements
Thank you to Cindy Salazar for her creative talents in designing the
publication.
Glossary of Terms
Bioaccumulate:
The net accumulation of a contaminant in an organism from all sources,
including air, water, and food. For example, toxic chemicals tend to
bioaccumulate in the muscle and fatty tissues of fish, and these toxins
increase in concentration as they are passed from the prey to the
predators (biomagnification).
Bioavailability:
The extent to which a substance is absorbed and circulated in the body.
Biodegradation:
The breakdown of organic material into simpler components by
microorganisms.
Biota: The
plant and animal life of a particular region.
Bioturbation:
The rearrangement of sediments by organisms that burrow through them and
ingest them.
Fungi: Molds,
mildews, yeasts, mushrooms, and puffballs. The fungi represent a group
of organisms that lack chlorophyll and therefore are not photosynthetic.
They are important in the environment as decomposers.
Hydrophobic:
Literally water fearing, nonpolar compounds that are immiscible with
water.
Nonpoint Source:
A pollution source that cannot be defined as originating from discrete
points such as a pipe discharge. Areas of fertilizer and pesticide
applications, atmospheric deposition, manure, and natural inputs from
plants and trees are types of nonpoint source pollution.
Phytoplankton:
Microscopic plants.
Protists:
Free-living or colonial organisms with diverse nutritional and
reproductive modes.
Sediment
Solidification: The process by which contaminated sediment is mixed
with cement-like material. The hardened material is typically left on
site.
Zooplankton:
Small, often microscopic, animals that drift in the currents. They feed
on detritus, phytoplankton, and other zooplankton. They are preyed upon
by fish, shellfish, whales and other zooplankton.
03/04
This publication is published by the Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant College
Program, Richard Warner, Director. Funding is provided by the U.S. EPA
Office of Research and Development (ORD-NCER2A) under award number
NTP-0046. Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant is a joint federal and state
program of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Purdue
University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
It is the policy of
the Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, David C. Petritz,
Director, that all persons shall have equal opportunity and access to
its programs and facilities without regard to race, color, sex,
religion, national origin, age, marital status, parental status, sexual
orientation, or disability. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action
employer. This material may be available in alternative formats.
1-888-EXT-INFO •
http://www.ces.purdue.edu/marketing
|